the PAINFUL truth:

the PAINFUL truth:

14 thoughts on “the PAINFUL truth:

  1. work hard enough and one day you can buy your own home that you never actually own , because even decades after a home is paid for if ya stop paying the government for the home they take it back

    • Basis of this tax goes back 1000 or so years to where all property was owned by the British kings and the property ‘owner’ owed allegiance in the form of military service or taxes in lieu of fighting. When the person died it went back to the king. When we had the Revolution the states assumed that right and the collection of said tax.



    Your firm’s name
    City, State & Zip

    To Whom It May Concern:

    This “Privacy Notice” is in conformance to the Constitutional principles of PRIVACY, DUE PROCESS, and EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW. This is a request pursuant to “The Privacy Act of 1974,” 5 USC 552A; “The Right to Financial Privacy Act,” 12 USC3401; “Confidentiality of Tax Records Act”, 26 USC 6103, and Internal Revenue Code section 7609.

    The right to PRIVACY is defined in the following manner:

    PRIVACY, right of. – The right to be let alone; the right of a human to be free from unwarranted publicity. Term “right of privacy” is generic term encompassing various rights recognized to be inherent in concept of ordered liberty, and such right prevents governmental interference in intimate personal relationships or activities, freedoms of individual to make fundamental choices involving himself, his family, and his relationship with others. Industrial Foundation of the South v. Texas indus. Acc. Bd. Tex., — 540 S.W.2d 668,679. The right of an individual (or corporation) to withhold himself and his property from public scrutiny, if he so chooses. It is said to exist only so far as its assertion is consistent with law or public policy, and in proper case equity will interfere, if there is no remedy at law, to prevent an injury threatened by the invasion of, or infringement upon, this right from motives of curiosity, gain or malice. Federal Trade Commission v. American Tobacco Co., 264 U.S.298,44 S.Ct.336,68 L.Ed.696. See also Whalen v Roe, 429 U.S.589, 97 S.Ct.869,51 L.Ed.2d 64; Warren and Brandeis, The Right to Privacy, 4 Harv.L.Rev.193.

    —5TH Edition, Black’s Law Dictionary. —-
    (emphasis mine)

    I request that this company DOES NOT reveal any part or portion of my personnel file to any government agency, agent, or any other third party, without a court order signed by a duly appointed or elected judge; to do so is a clear invasion of my privacy, (Internal Revenue Service Summons are signed by Internal Revenue agents – they ARE NOT a court order signed by a duly appointed or elected judge.) My personnel folder is for company user ONLY!

    I request that you RED TAG my personnel file so that no one at this firm will inadvertently or accidently give out any information that is contained within. I request for information about me that you receive from any government agency, agent, or any other third party.

    Lawfully you can refuse to furnish records on the demands or directives of administrative agents or agency regulations, such as, Treasury Decision 7772 or IRS Employment Tax Regulation 31.3402(f)(2)—a(g), which are not laws, without being punished for doing so. Pursuant to 26 USC 3402(n), you WILL NOT be subject to taxes or penalties under Code sections 3403, 6672, 6651, or 6656. This firm is in a position to comply with this request without suffering any penalty whatsoever.

    The Supreme Court has ruled in Reisman v. Caplin, 375 US 440, 84F S.Ct. 508 (1964) that you can not only refuse request for information, but you can also refuse an IRS Summons and demand a court order signed by a duly appointed or elected judge. The Federal courts have held in Reisman and other cases, that one of the grounds upon which you can deny government access to a worker’s records is that the worker may institute a lawsuit against the company for damages should the information be released against his request for privacy. If necessary, you may asset that position using this notice as justification.

    This Privacy Notice will remain in effect until further notice; your compliance and cooperation will be greatly appreciated.

    Warmest regards,

    Your name
    City, State and [Zip]

  3. here it is who they are:The Oath of Office – Title 5 USC 331, 332, 333 backed up by 22 C.F.R. – Code of Federal Regulations 92.12-92.31 FR Heading “Foreign Relationship” states that an oath is required to take office and Title 8 USC, section 1481 – the public official relinquishes his national citizenship and are thus foreign agents as stipulated under Title 22 USC, chapter 11, section 611, loss of national citizenship – Public officials are no longer US Citizens, but rather are foreign agents and must register as such.==Failure to file (FARA) the “Foreign Agents Registration Act”: Statement” goes directly to the jurisdiction and lack of standing to be before the court, and is a felony pursuant to 18 USC §§ 219, 951. The conflict of law, interest and allegiance is obvious.

Leave a Reply